바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

검색어: 다차원척도법, 검색결과: 5
초록보기
초록

개체들 사이의 관계를 저차원 공간에 매핑하는 다차원척도법을 수행하기 위한 다양한 방법과 알고리즘이 개발되어왔다. 그러나 PROXSCAL이나 ALSCAL과 같은 기존의 기법들은 50개 이상의 개체를 포함하는 데이터 집합을 대상으로 개체 간의 관계와 군집 구조를 시각화하는데 있어서 효과적이지 못한 것으로 나타났다. 이 연구에서 제안하는 군집 지향 척도법 CLUSCAL(CLUster-oriented SCALing)은 기존 방법과 달리 입력되는 데이터의 군집 구조를 고려하도록 고안되었다. 50명의 저자동시인용 데이터와 85개 단어의 동시출현 데이터에 대해서 적용해본 결과 제안한 CLUSCAL 기법은 군집 구조를 잘 식별할 수 있는 MDS 지도를 생성하는 유용한 기법임이 확인되었다.

Abstract

There have been many methods and algorithms proposed for multidimensional scaling to mapping the relationships between data objects into low dimensional space. But traditional techniques, such as PROXSCAL or ALSCAL, were found not effective for visualizing the proximities between objects and the structure of clusters of large data sets have more than 50 objects. The CLUSCAL(CLUster-oriented SCALing) technique introduced in this paper differs from them especially in that it uses cluster structure of input data set. The CLUSCAL procedure was tested and evaluated on two data sets, one is 50 authors co-citation data and the other is 85 words co-occurrence data. The results can be regarded as promising the usefulness of CLUSCAL method especially in identifying clusters on MDS maps.

2
김효윤(연수청학도서관) ; 조재인(인천대학교) 2017, Vol.34, No.1, pp.51-71 https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2017.34.1.051
초록보기
초록

본 연구는 초등학교 저학년과 고학년, 학부모로 구성된 어린이 도서관 이용자들 200여명이 인지하는 별치 자료간 희망 인지 거리를 다차원척도법(Multi-Dimensional Scaling: MDS)과 K-means 군집분석을 활용해 비교 분석하고 이들의 인지 거리가 실제 어린이 도서관에 어떻게 투영되어 있는지 몇 가지 사례를 통하여 검토해 보았다. 다차원척도법은 분석 대상의 유사성이나 속성 등을 평가하여 공간상에 투영시키는 기법으로 마케팅에서 주로 시장 진단을 위해 활용되지만, 제품이나 시설에 대한 이용자의 인지적 거리를 분석하여 이상적인 물리적 배치 방안을 제시하는 데에도 적용할 수 있다. 분석 결과, 별치 자료간 인지 거리에 있어 초등학교 저학년과 고학년 그리고 학부모 집단간에 각각 차이가 나타났으며, 특히 유․아동자료와 컴퓨터자료 그리고 유아자료와 아동자료간의 인지 거리에 있어 큰 차이가 존재하는 것으로 분석되었다. 한편, Y구의 3개 어린이도서관을 대상으로 분석된 인지 거리 체계가 어떻게 투영되어 있는지 확인해 본 결과, 특정 집단의 인지 체계에 완벽히 부합하는 공간 구조를 지닌 도서관은 존재하지 않았으나, 공통적으로 유․아동자료와 컴퓨터자료, 그리고 유아자료와 아동자료가 분리 배치되어 있다는 점에서 학부모와 초등학생들의 인지 거리가 부분적으로 투영되어 있는 것으로 검토되었다.

Abstract

This study conducted a survey to measure recognition distance between the materials which are located separately in a children’s library targeting 200 elementary school lower grade students, higher grade students, and school parents(adults). And compared recognition distance between the elements of materials of individual visitor group with multidimensional scaling and K-mean group analysis. Multidimensional Scaling (MDS) is a technique for projecting the cognitive state in space by evaluating the similarity or attribute of the analysis target. Even though it is mainly used for market diagnosis in marketing, It can also be applied to present an ideal physical layout plan by analyzing the distance. As a result of analysis, the main discoveries are as follows. First, elementary school students cognize child, baby and computer materials should be adjacent as a same group. But recognition of adults(school parents) is reflected by differing from elementary school students vastly. They cognize that computer materials should be formed as a special group separated from child and baby’s materials. Second, elementary school higher graders and adults(school parents) groups also want to separate their main reading materials from baby’s book, therefore They both want to secure silent reading space separating from baby. Third, as a result to confirming how this recognition distance system of materials is reflected in a real children’s library through three children’s libraries in Y-gu, Incheon, there is no library with structure according perfectly with a recognition system of a particular class, but a recognition system of adults and elementary school students is partially reflected because baby, child and computer materials, and baby and child materials are commonly separated and placed. It is difficult to insist that a recognition system of a visitor group, especially a recognition system of children is absolute consideration conditions in material placement of a children’s library. However, understanding cognition of the user groups can be an important evidentiary factors to offer differentiated service space according to visitors and effective placement of the elements of library resources.

3
이재윤(명지대학교) ; 정은경(이화여자대학교) 2014, Vol.31, No.2, pp.57-77 https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2014.31.2.057
초록보기
초록

Abstract

As co-authorship has been prevalent within science communities, counting the credit of co-authors appropriately is an important consideration, particularly in the context of identifying the knowledge structure of fields with author-based analysis. The purpose of this study is to compare the characteristics of co-author credit counting methods by utilizing correlations, multidimensional scaling, and pathfinder networks. To achieve this purpose, this study analyzed a dataset of 2,014 journal articles and 3,892 cited authors from the Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea: Planning & Design from 2003 to 2008 in the field of Architecture in Korea. In this study, six different methods of crediting co-authors are selected for comparative analyses. These methods are first-author counting (m1), straight full counting (m2), and fractional counting (m3), proportional counting with a total score of 1 (m4), proportional counting with a total score between 1 and 2 (m5), and first-author-weighted fractional counting (m6). As shown in the data analysis, m1 and m2 are found as extreme opposites, since m1 counts only first authors and m2 assigns all co-authors equally with a credit score of 1. With correlation and multidimensional scaling analyses, among five counting methods (from m2 to m6), a group of counting methods including m3, m4, and m5 are found to be relatively similar. When the knowledge structure is visualized with pathfinder network, the knowledge structure networks from different counting methods are differently presented due to the connections of individual links. In addition, the internal validity shows that first-author-weighted fractional counting (m6) might be considered a better method to author clustering. Findings demonstrate that different co-author counting methods influence the network results of knowledge structure and a better counting method is revealed for author clustering.

4
박지연(이화여자대학교) ; 정동열(이화여자대학교) 2013, Vol.30, No.4, pp.31-59 https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2013.30.4.031
초록보기
초록

본 연구는 저자서지결합분석을 사용하여 한국 문헌정보학의 1990년대와 2000년대 지적구조와 그 변화를 분석하는데 목적을 두고 있다. 이를 위해 첫째, 군집분석, 다차원척도법을 통하여 시기별 세부 주제 영역을 밝혔다. 둘째, 네트워크 분석을 통해 세부 주제 영역 간 관계를 시각화하고 전역 중심성이 높은 주제 영역을 확인하였다. 셋째, 1990년대와 2000년대 지적구조 비교를 통해 시간의 경과에 따른 주제 영역의 흐름을 규명하였다.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the intellectual structure of domestic LIS in the 1990s and 2000s using author bibliographic coupling analysis (ABCA). First, cluster analysis and multi-dimensional scaling analysis were performed to examine core subject areas and to map authors in two-dimensional space. Second, network analysis was used to visualize intellectual relationships among subject areas and to reveal the top subject areas for global centrality. Third, the 1990s and 2000s intellectual structures was compared to identify the changes of the intellectual structure over the course of time.

초록보기
초록

패스파인더 네트워크를 사용하여 지적 구조의 분석과 규명을 시도한 여러 연구가 발표되었다. 패스파인더 네트워크는 다차원척도법에 비해서 여러 장점을 가지고 있지만 구축 알고리즘의 복잡도가 매우 높아서 실행 시간이 오래 걸리며, 전통적인 지적 구조 분석에 유용하게 사용되어온 군집분석을 함께 적용하기가 어려운 것이 단점이다. 이 연구에서는 이와 같은 패스파인더 네트워크의 약점을 보완할 수 있는 새로운 기법으로 병렬 최근접 이웃 클러스터링(PNNC) 기법을 제안하였다. PNNC 기법의 클러스터링 성능을 전통적인 계층적 병합식 클러스터링 기법들과 비교해본 결과 효과성과 효율성 양면에서 기존 기법보다 우세한 것으로 확인되었다.

Abstract

Recently there are many bibliometric studies attempting to utilize Pathfinder networks(PFNets) for examining and analyzing the intellectual structure of a scholarly field. Pathfinder network scaling has many advantages over traditional multidimensional scaling, including its ability to represent local details as well as global intellectual structure. However there are some limitations in PFNets including very high time complexity. And Pathfinder network scaling cannot be combined with cluster analysis, which has been combined well with traditional multidimensional scaling method. In this paper, a new method named as Parallel Nearest Neighbor Clustering (PNNC) are proposed for complementing those weak points of PFNets. Comparing the clustering performance with traditional hierarchical agglomerative clustering methods shows that PNNC is not only a complement to PFNets but also a fast and powerful clustering method for organizing informations.

정보관리학회지