초록

본 연구의 목적은 한국학 분야 국내 학술지 논문 데이터를 대상으로 계층적 군집 분석을 적용해 한국학 분야의 지식 구조를 구성하는 연구 영역을 분석하는 것이다. 이를 위해 KCI에서 탑재된 한국학 관련 학술지 중 2011년~2013년도 기준 3년치 평균 Impact Factor 값이 0.5 이상이며, 2004년부터 2013년까지의 10년치 누적 논문 데이터를 갖고 있는 14종의 학술지에 수록된 논문 중 한글 저자키워드 데이터가 포함되어 있는 3,800편을 분석하였다. 분석 결과, 중심 연구 분야는 대체로 성리학과 실학 중심의 유교 사상을 기반으로 한 정치와 사회에 관한 연구, 한반도의 분단 체제를 둘러싼 정치 관련 연구, 그리고 일제 강점기에서 근현대의 역사인 것으로 나타났다. 시기적으로는 고대나 현대 시점보다는 조선시대부터 근대 시기까지를 대상으로 하는 연구들이 많은 것으로 나타났다.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the research fields constituting the knowledge structure of the Korean Studies by applying hierarchical clustering method to domestic journal papers in Korean Studies. We analyzed 3,800 papers containing Korean author keyword that were listed in 14 kinds of Korean Studies journals published in 2004-2013, which have average impact factor more than 0.5 in 2011-2013. The results of the analysis show that the central research fields are the subjects related to political & social problems based on Confucian ideas focusing on Neo-Confucianism(Seonglihak) and Realist School of Confucianism(Silhak), to the political situation associated with territorial division of the Korean peninsula, and to the history from the period of japanese colonialism to modern and contemporary. It has been also found that the temporal backgrounds of researches in domestic Korean Studies were related to the modern times and the Joseon Dynasty periods, rather than the time of the ancient and contemporary.

초록

This study proposes the analysis method in sentence semantics that can be automatically identified and processed as appropriate items in the system according to the composition of the sentences contained in the data corresponding to the logical semantic structure metadata of the research papers. In order to achieve the purpose, the structure of sentences corresponding to ‘Research Objectives’ and ‘Research Outcomes’ among the semantic structure metadata was analyzed based on the number of words, the link word types, the role of many-appeared words in sentences, and the end types of a word. As a result of this study, the number of words in the sentences was 38 in ‘Research Objectives’ and 212 in ‘Research Outcomes’. The link word types in ‘Research Objectives’ were occurred in the order such as Causality, Sequence, Equivalence, In-other-word/Summary relation, and the link word types in ‘Research Outcomes’ were appeared in the order such as Causality, Equivalence, Sequence, In-other-word/Summary relation. Analysis target words like ‘역할(Role)’, ‘요인(Factor)’ and ‘관계(Relation)’ played a similar role in both purpose and result part, but the role of ‘연구(Study)’ was little different. Finally, the verb endings in sentences were appeared many times such as ‘∼고자’, ‘∼였다’ in ‘Research Objectives’, and ‘∼었다’, ‘∼있다’, ‘∼였다’ in ‘Research Outcomes’. This study is significant as a fundamental research that can be utilized to automatically identify and input the metadata element reflecting the common logical semantics of research papers in order to support researchers’ scholarly sensemaking.

Abstract