초록

본 연구에서는 다학제적 연구가 활발해진 국내 연구의 동향을 파악하기 위하여 2020 구글 스칼라 매트릭스에 색인된 국내 주요 학술지 데이터를 활용하여 전 학문분야를 포괄하는 네트워크 분석(대학협력 네트워크, 키워드 동시출현 네트워크, 학술지 인용 네트워크, 학문분야 인용 네트워크)을 실시하였다. 대학협력 네트워크 분석결과, 서울대학교, 계명대학교, 성균관대학교 등 협력연구를 활발히 진행하는 대학을 파악할 수 있었고, 키워드 동시출현 네트워크 분석결과, 이직의도, 직무만족 등 직무 관련 키워드가 높은 빈도로 나타남을 확인하였다. 학술지 인용 네트워크에서는 한국콘텐츠학회논문지, 한국사회학, 한국심리학회지: 문화 및 사회문제 등 인용이 많이 되고 있는 핵심 학술지들을 확인하였으며, 학문분야 인용 네트워크에서는 교육학, 경영학, 사회복지학이 다른 학문에 가장 많은 영향을 미치는 학문임을 확인하였다. 본 연구에서는 기존의 국내 계량서지분석연구에서 시도하지 않았던 구글 스칼라 매트릭스 데이터를 처음 활용하였으며, 키워드, 학술지, 학문분야로 범위를 확장시켜가며 단계적 네트워크 분석을 실시하였다는 점에서 학술적 의의를 가지며, 연구결과는 국내 대학 간 공동연구의 전략 수립 및 다학제적 융합 연구 기획에 활용될 수 있다는 점에서 실질적인 함의를 시사한다.

Abstract

This study aims to understand the research landscape of South Korea using the data of 2020 Google Scholar Metrics. To achieve the goal, we constructed and analyzed four types of networks including the university collaboration network, the keyword co-occurrence network, the journal citation network, and the discipline citation network. Through the analysis of the university collaboration network, we found major universities such as Seoul National University, Keimyung University, and Sungkyunkwan University that have led collaborative research. Job related keywords such as job change intention and job satisfaction have been frequently studied with other keywords. Through the analysis of the journal citation network, we found multiple journals such as The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, Korean Journal of Sociology, and Korean Journal of Culture and Social Issues that have been widely cited by the other journals and influenced them. Finally, Education, Business administration, and Social welfare were identified as the top influential disciplines that have influenced other disciplines through the knowledge diffusion. The study is the first of its kind to use the data of Google Scholar Metrics and conduct a stepwise network analysis (e.g., keyword, journal, and discipline) to broadly understand the research landscape of South Korea. Our results can be used by government agencies and universities to develop effective strategies of promoting university collaboration and interdisciplinary research.

초록

Abstract

Since the 1990s, informetrics has grown in popularity among information scientists. Today it is a general discipline that comprises all kinds of metrics, including bibliometrics and scientometrics. To illustrate the dynamic progress of this field, this study aims to identify the structure and infrastructure of the informetrics literature using statistical and profiling methods. Informetrics literature was obtained from the Web of Knowledge for the years 2001-2010. The selected articles contain least one of these keywords: ‘informetrics’, ‘bibliometrics’, ‘scientometrics’, ‘webometrics’, and ‘citation analysis.’ Noteworthy publication patterns of major countries were identified by a statistical method. Intellectual structure analysis shows major research areas, authors, and journals.

초록

패스파인더 네트워크를 사용하여 지적 구조의 분석과 규명을 시도한 여러 연구가 발표되었다. 패스파인더 네트워크는 다차원척도법에 비해서 여러 장점을 가지고 있지만 구축 알고리즘의 복잡도가 매우 높아서 실행 시간이 오래 걸리며, 전통적인 지적 구조 분석에 유용하게 사용되어온 군집분석을 함께 적용하기가 어려운 것이 단점이다. 이 연구에서는 이와 같은 패스파인더 네트워크의 약점을 보완할 수 있는 새로운 기법으로 병렬 최근접 이웃 클러스터링(PNNC) 기법을 제안하였다. PNNC 기법의 클러스터링 성능을 전통적인 계층적 병합식 클러스터링 기법들과 비교해본 결과 효과성과 효율성 양면에서 기존 기법보다 우세한 것으로 확인되었다.

Abstract

Recently there are many bibliometric studies attempting to utilize Pathfinder networks(PFNets) for examining and analyzing the intellectual structure of a scholarly field. Pathfinder network scaling has many advantages over traditional multidimensional scaling, including its ability to represent local details as well as global intellectual structure. However there are some limitations in PFNets including very high time complexity. And Pathfinder network scaling cannot be combined with cluster analysis, which has been combined well with traditional multidimensional scaling method. In this paper, a new method named as Parallel Nearest Neighbor Clustering (PNNC) are proposed for complementing those weak points of PFNets. Comparing the clustering performance with traditional hierarchical agglomerative clustering methods shows that PNNC is not only a complement to PFNets but also a fast and powerful clustering method for organizing informations.

초록

사회 전반적으로 협업의 중요성과 필요성이 강조되고 있으며, 연구자들의 협업 역시 증가하고 있다. 연구자의 협업에는 학자로서의 특성이 반영된다는 점에서 특이성을 가진다. 본 연구는 연구자 협업 패턴에 영향을 미치는 요인을 알아보기 위해 가설을 설정하고 이를 검증하였다. 영향 요인은 연구자들의 협업 행태 및 동기에 대한 선행연구를 토대로 추출하였으며, 계량정보학 분야 연구자들을 대상으로 네트워크 분석과 설문 분석의 두 가지 방법을 활용하여 가설을 검증하였다. 설문은 네트워크 분석에 포함된 연구자를 대상으로 한 웹 설문으로 진행하였다. 본 연구 결과는 연구자 인식 분석을 통한 개인적 선택 요인과 관계 계량정보학 분석을 통한 집단적 결과 요인을 분석했다는 점에서 의의가 있으며, 연구자 협업을 장려하는 정책 및 디지털 협업서비스 기획 등에 활용될 수 있을 것이라 기대된다.

Abstract

The collaboration is becoming ever more widespread in scientific research. Unlike collaboration in other areas such as in a company, research collaboration has an unique feature that it is reflected by scholars’ characteristics. Based on previous studies on research collaboration, five major factors are identified. We propose five hypotheses from them and examine these by using both in-person questionnaire survey and relational bibliometric analysis. The survey analysis informs individual choice factors and the bibliometric analysis informs collective consequence factors. The results of this study may have implications for science policies and digital collaboration services.

초록

약물중독 혹은 약물사용장애(substance use disorder)는 세계적으로 그 위험성과 유행성이 지속적으로 관측 되고 있다. 이러한 배경에서 수많은 관련 연구들이 진행이 되어왔지만, 이와 관련한 계량서지학적 분석은 미진한 상황이다. 특히, 약물중독과 관련된 다양한 특성들을 종합적으로 반영한 거시적 차원의 계량서지학적 접근법을 활용한 연구는 찾아보기가 힘든 상황이다. 이 연구에서는 이러한 약물중독의 다차원적 특성을 반영하기 위해 사회과학, 자연과학기술, 융복합 분야에서의 약물중독 연구 동향을 비교 분석하였다. 이 연구는 2002년부터 2021년까지의 약물중독 연구 논문을 Web of Science로부터 검색 후 수집하였으며, SCI(E) 및 SSCI 정보를 토대로 학문 분야를 분류하였다. 저자 키워드 동시출현 분석을 수행한 결과, 자연과학기술은 신경정신약물과 보상시스템에 관한 연구가 주를 이루었고, 사회과학 분야에서는 이보다는 인구학적 특성이 반영된 약물중독 연구가 수행되어 왔음을 알 수 있었고, 융복합 분야에서는 이러한 동향을 모두 아우르고 있는 것을 확인할 수 있었다. 저자 동시인용 분석도 수행을 하였는데, 이를 통해 자연과학기술 분야는 슈퍼 저자들이 관측된 반면, 사회과학 분야에서는 개인 저자뿐 아니라 기관 저자까지도 인용이 많이 되는 것으로 확인이 되었다.

Abstract

Drug addiction or substance use disorder is continuously observed worldwide for its risks and prevalence. In this context, numerous studies have been conducted regarding this issue. However, bibliometric analysis related to drug addiction is insufficient. In particular, it is difficult to find research that utilizes a macro-level bibliographic approach that comprehensively reflects various characteristics related to drug addiction. In this study, to reflect the multidimensional features of drug addiction, research trends in drug addiction in social science, natural science, and multidisciplinary studies were compared and analyzed. This study collected drug addiction research articles from 2002 to 2021 by searching from the Web of Science, and classified academic disciplines based on SCI(E) and SSCI information. Author keyword co-occurrence analysis was also conducted, which provided confirmation that natural science mainly studied psychoactive substances and the reward system in the brain, while drug addiction studies reflecting demographic characteristics were conducted in the domain of social science. In the multidisciplinary field, all of the above topics were covered. Author co-citation analysis was also employed, which showed that there are superstars (i.e., authors who receive a rigorous amount of citation) in the field of natural science, while in the social science domain, authors were highly cited not only at the individual level but also at the institutional level.

초록

Abstract

In this study, the author examined medical information management research trends in abroad and Korea from the perspectives of library and information science. LISA was used to collect research data in abroad from 2007 to 2010 (a total of 225 research articles). Korean studies were investigated using DBPIA to compare research trends. Content analysis results based on subject category show that research in abroad increased consistently and electronic resources and collection-related subjects were frequently studied. In Korea, the electronic resources and collection-related research proportion was also high, and much research was done in the areas of bibliometrics. However, medical information management researches did not increase in Korea between 2000 and 2010.

초록

Abstract

This paper examines the characteristics of the JASIST (Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology) editorial board members and their research areas through author co-citation analysis, and investigates whether the editorial board members’ research areas are related with keywords frequently appeared in the journal’s research articles. In the process, research areas of the central members and those appeared most frequently as keywords will be identified. Research areas of the 36 members on the JASIST editorial board are collected and categorized to compare with the categorization of keywords extracted from 169 research articles published in JASIST, 2013. The result shows that members with higher centrality in the co-citation network are related with research areas that are also dominant in the distribution of article keywords. The areas include information behavior and searching, information retrieval, information system design, and bibliometrics.

초록

Abstract

Since information scientists have begun trying to quantify significant research trends in scientific publications, ‘-metrics’ research such as ‘bibliometrics’, ‘scientometrics’, ‘informetrics’, ‘webometrics’, and ‘citation analysis’ have been identified as crucial areas of information science. To illustrate the dynamic research activities in these areas, this study investigated the major contributors of ‘-metrics’ research for the last decade at three levels: nations, institutions, and documents. ‘-metrics’ literature of this study was obtained from the Science Citation Index for the years 2001-2011. In this analysis, we used Pathfinder network, PNNC algorithm, PageRank and several indicators based on h-index. In terms of international collaborations, USA and England were identified as major countries. At the institutional level, Katholieke University, Leuven and the University of Amsterdam in Europe and Indiana University and the Office of Naval Research in the USA have led co-research projects in informetrics areas. At the document level, Hirsch’s h-index paper and Ingwersen’s web impact factor paper were identified as the most influential work by two methods: PageRank and single paper h-index.

초록

본 연구는 ‘우수한 성능의 메타데이터 속성 유사도 기반의 학술 문헌추천시스템’을 제안하는 데에 목적을 두고 있다. 본 연구에서는 정보조직에서 다루는 메타데이터의 활용과 계량정보학에서 다루고 있는 동시인용, 저자-서지결합법, 동시출현 빈도, 코사인 유사도의 개념을 활용한 문헌정보학 기반의 학술 문헌 추천기법을 제안하고자 하였다. 실험을 위해 수집한 ‘불평등’, ‘격차’ 관련 총 9,643개의 논문 메타데이터를 정제하여 코사인 유사도를 활용한 저자, 키워드, 제목 속성 간의 상대적 좌표 수치를 도출하였고, 성능 좋은 가중치 조건 및 차원의 수를 선정하기 위해 실험을 수행하였다. 실험 결과를 제시하여 이용자의 평가를 거쳤으며, 이를 이용해 기준노드와 추천조합 특성 분석 및 컨조인트 분석, 결과 비교 분석을 수행하여 연구질문 중심의 논의를 수행하였다. 그 결과 전반적으로는 저자 관련 속성을 제한 조합 혹은 제목 관련 속성만 사용하는 경우 성능이 뛰어난 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구에서 제시한 기법을 활용하고 광범위한 표본의 확보를 이룬다면, 향후 정보서비스의 문헌 추천 분야뿐 아니라 사회의 다양한 분야에 대한 추천기법 성능 향상에 도움을 줄 수 있을 것이다.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to propose a scholarly paper recommendation system based on metadata attribute similarity with excellent performance. This study suggests a scholarly paper recommendation method that combines techniques from two sub-fields of Library and Information Science, namely metadata use in Information Organization and co-citation analysis, author bibliographic coupling, co-occurrence frequency, and cosine similarity in Bibliometrics. To conduct experiments, a total of 9,643 paper metadata related to “inequality” and “divide” were collected and refined to derive relative coordinate values between author, keyword, and title attributes using cosine similarity. The study then conducted experiments to select weight conditions and dimension numbers that resulted in a good performance. The results were presented and evaluated by users, and based on this, the study conducted discussions centered on the research questions through reference node and recommendation combination characteristic analysis, conjoint analysis, and results from comparative analysis. Overall, the study showed that the performance was excellent when author-related attributes were used alone or in combination with title-related attributes. If the technique proposed in this study is utilized and a wide range of samples are secured, it could help improve the performance of recommendation techniques not only in the field of literature recommendation in information services but also in various other fields in society.

초록

본 연구는 기존의 연구성과 분석의 한계를 극복하고 영향력이나 파급효과 등 질적 중심의 연구성과 분석을 위해 텍스트 마이닝, 인용 분석 등을 활용한 새로운 계량정보학적 분석지표를 제안하였다. 즉, 논문품질지수, 인용 영향력지수, 지식확산지수, 국제협력연구지수, 우수논문 생산지수 등 새로운 연구성과 분석지표를 제안하여 질적인 측면을 중심으로 한 연구성과 분석이 가능하도록 하였다. 그리고 제안된 지표를 활용하여 사례분석을 수행하여 그 가능성을 확인하였다.

Abstract

There are some limitations in the existing bibliometric methods to satisfy the various requests of the interest parties including researchers, managers, policy makers to identify 1) which research group or researcher is the key player, and the overall trends of the particular technological sub-fields, 2) which research groups, institutions or countries mainly use their research outputs, 3) what are the spin-offs from research outputs to some scientific and technological fields, 4) in which levels they are when comparing their quantitative and qualitative research outputs to those of other competitive institutions. It is essential to develop new informetric indicators and methodologies in order to satisfy stakeholder's various demands and to strengthen qualitative analysis in measuring research performance. This study suggested informetric indicators such as article quality index, citation impact index, international cooperation index, excellent article production index and methodologies including citation analysis, text mining.