바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

논문 상세

이전 다음
논문 투고

Vol.21 No.3
Citation Share

온톨로지를 이용한 의학용어의 개념 모델링 사례 분석 연구

A Study of the Case Analysis of Conceptual Modeling of Medical Terminologies by Ontology

정보관리학회지 / Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, (P)1013-0799; (E)2586-2073
2004, v.21 no.3, pp.141-160
https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2004.21.3.141
이현실 (원광대학교)
이현실. (2004). 온톨로지를 이용한 의학용어의 개념 모델링 사례 분석 연구. 정보관리학회지, 21(3), 141-160, https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2004.21.3.141
  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수
PDF 다운로드

초록

최근 의학정보 분야에서는 임상의 지식관리와 의학정보 검색의 효율화를 위한 수단으로 온톨로지의 개념 모델링을 이용한 의학용어 시스템에 관심이 모아지고 있다. 본 연구는 우리나라의 의학정보 분야에 이러한 시스템의 응용이나 새로운 시스템 개발에 기초적인 자료제공을 목적으로, 정보 모델링과 온톨로지의 이론에 대해 고찰하였고, 외국의 의학정보 분야에서 온톨로지를 이용한 용어 시스템이 개발된 4가지 대표적인 사례를 분석하여 비교하였다. 연구결과 비형식적인 수준의 온톨로지로 파악된 MeSH의 의학용어 표준화와 UMLS의 용어 개념화, 형식적인 수준의 온톨로지인 ON9의 의학 온톨로지 통합의 이론화, 그리고 GALEN의 의학지식의 의미 모델과 형식화로 핵심적 특징을 요약할 수 있었다. 온톨로지의 응용은 목적하는 시스템에 따른 수준적 차별화가 이루어져야 할 것이고, 본 연구의 분석 결과가 참고 될 수 있을 것이다.

keywords
개념모델링, 온톨로지, 의학용어 MeSH, UMLS, ON9, GALEN, concept modeling, ontology, medical terminology, 개념모델링, 온톨로지, 의학용어 MeSH, UMLS, ON9, GALEN, concept modeling, ontology, medical terminology

Abstract

Recent research in the field of medical information systems has paid much attention to an ontology based medical terminology system to support clinical study and effective information search. This study aims to conduct research for further application or construction of ontology systems in Korea. This research reviews the theory of concept modeling and ontology, and analyses 4 cases of conceptual modeling of medical terminologies by ontology. The findings of this study display these specific characteristics in medical ontologies : (1) The standardization of terminology on MeSH. (2) The conceptualization of terminology on UMLS. (1) and (2) are showed as unformal ontologies. (3) The theory of ontology integration in ON9. (4) The reference model of medical knowledge with formalization in GALEN. (3) and (4) are showed as formal ontologies. The application and construction of ontology should be differentiated according to the level of the proposed system, and then this analysis will provide useful information for the researcher and developer of the system.

keywords
개념모델링, 온톨로지, 의학용어 MeSH, UMLS, ON9, GALEN, concept modeling, ontology, medical terminology, 개념모델링, 온톨로지, 의학용어 MeSH, UMLS, ON9, GALEN, concept modeling, ontology, medical terminology

참고문헌

1.

김혜선. (2001). 통합의학언어 시스템(UMLS)의 구성 및 적용에 대한 고찰.. 情報管理硏究, 32(2), 26-39.

2.

김홍기. (2003). 의료정보학에서 온톨로지 기술. 대한의료정보학회지, 9(3), 213-219.

3.

Abasolo, Jose María. (2004). MELISA. An ontology- based agent for information retrieval in medicine. http://www.ics.forth.gr/isl/SemWeb/proceedings/session3-1/paper.pdf.

4.

Brodie, M. L. (1984). On Conceptual Modeling:New York : Springer- Verlag..

5.

Burgun, A. (1999). IEEE International Conference On SMC ’99. IEEE International Conference On SMC ’99, 6, 300-305.

6.

Corcho, Oscar,. ntoWeb Technical Roadmap v1.0. IST Programme of the Commi- ssion of the European Communities as Project. .

7.

Fensel, Dieter. (2000). On-To-Knowledge: Ontology-Based Tools for Knowl- edge Management.. http://www.cs.vu.nl/~frankh/postscript/eBeW00.pdf.

8.

Gangemi, Aldo. (1999). An Overview of the ONIONS project: Applying ontologies to the integration of me- dical terminologies. ata & Knowl- edge Engineering,, 31, 183-220.

9.

Gruber, T. (1993). A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowledge Acquisition, 5, 199-220.

10.

Guarino, Nicola. (1998). Formal Ontology and Information Systems (-). In Proceedings of FOIS'98. IOS Press.

11.

Hahn, Udo. (1999). How knowledge drives understanding-matching medical ontologies with the needs of medical language processing. Artificial intelligence in medicine, 15, 25-51.

12.

Ingenerf, Jose. (2001). Standardized Termi- nological Services Enabling Semantic Interoperability Between Distributed and Heterogeneous Systems.. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 64, 223-240.

13.

Keizer, N. F. (2000). Understanding Terminological Systems I: Terminology and Typology. Methods of Information In Medicine, 39(1), 16-21.

14.

McCray, A. T. (1995). Concepts, Knowledge, and Language in Health-Care Information Systems. Methods of Information in Me- dicine, 34(1), 1-4.

15.

Mylopoulos, John. (1998). Information modeling in the time of the revolution.. Information Systems, 23(3), 127-155.

16.

Neches, Robert. (1991). Enabling Technology for Knowledge Sharing. AI Magazine, 12(3), 36-56.

17.

(2004). MeSH. http://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/.

18.

(2003). UMLS. http://www.nlm.nih.gov/research/umls.

19.

(2004). GALEN. http://www.opengalen.org.

20.

Rogers, Jeremy. (2000). GALEN‘s Model of Parts and Wholes: Experience and Compa- risons. (714-718). Proceedings American Medical Informatics Association Symposium.

21.

Rogers, J. E. (2004). Extended Core Model for Representation of the Common Reference Model for Procedures. http://www.opengalen.org/open/crm/.

22.

Stefano, Dessena. (1999). Development of a cross-thesaurus with Internet-based refinement supported by UMLS.. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 54, 29-41.

23.

Steve, Geri. (2004). Integrating Medical Terminolo- gies with ONIONS Methodology. http://www.loa-cnr.it/Papers/onions97.pdf.

24.

Studer, Rudi. (1998). Knowledge Engineering : Principles and Me- thods. Data & Knowledge Engi- neering, 25(1), 161-197.

25.

Wand, Yair. (1996). Ontology as a foundation for meta-modelling and method engineering. Information and Software Technology, 38, 181-187.

26.

(2009). OWL is a W3C Reco- mmendation.. http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/.

정보관리학회지

논문 투고 OA 정책