바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

논문 상세

이전 다음
논문 투고

Vol.21 No.3
Citation Share

전자책 활용에 영향을 미치는 요인 연구

A Study on Usability Evaluation Factors for e-Book User Interface

정보관리학회지 / Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, (P)1013-0799; (E)2586-2073
2004, v.21 no.3, pp.269-287
https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2004.21.3.269
장선화 (서울경제신문 편집부)
한상완 (연세대학교)
장선화, & 한상완. (2004). 전자책 활용에 영향을 미치는 요인 연구. 정보관리학회지, 21(3), 269-287, https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2004.21.3.269
  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수
PDF 다운로드

초록

The purpose of this study is to present a theoretical framework and practical methodology to extend the scope of Library and Information Science by incorporating the usability evaluation of e-book, which has considerably increased in proportion in the digital library. By surveying e-book users and through statistical analysis, it was found that rebuilding a set of usability evaluation factors for e-books is necessary to activate e-books in the digital libraries. This study inclusively presents a conceptual model of e-book usability evaluation and suggests guidelines for usability principles. 攀＊＊＊ 본 연구는 연세대학교 대학원 박사학위논문의 일부를 요약한 것임.＊＊＊ 서울경제신문 편집부 문화레저부 기자(india2121@empal.com)＊＊＊＊연세대학교 문과대학 문헌정보학과 교수(swhan@yonsei.ac.kr) 논문접수일자 : 2004년 8월 19일 게재확정일자 : 2004년 9월 10일攀攀

keywords
usability, e-book, systemetical factors, subjective factors, context in use, 이용성, 전자책, 주관적 평가요소, 시스템적 평가요소, 이용정황

참고문헌

1.

이민구. (1994). 제품의 수명주기에 의한 사용성 공학 모형의 적용. 한국공업경영학회지, 17(30), 177-184.

2.

이두영. (2003). 통합정보검색시스템의 인터페이스 평가지표에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 20(3), 177-197.

3.

이수원. (2001). WBI(Web Based Instruction) 학습환경에서 인터페이스의 메타포 구조가 학업성취 및 사용편의성에 미치는 영향. 교육공학연구, 17(1), 109-130.

4.

Dickstein, R. (2000). Usability Testing at the Univer- sity of Arizona Library: How to Let the Users in on the Design. Information Technology and Lib- raries, 19(3), 144-151.

5.

Dix, A. (1998). Human-Computer Interaction:London: Pearson Education..

6.

Guilford, Joy Paul. (1956). Fundamental Statistics in Psychology and Edu- cation:New York: McGrawHill.

7.

Henderson, Ron. (2003). Perceived Usefulness, Ease of Use and Electronic Super- market Use. International Journal of Human and Computer Studies, 59(3), 383-395.

8.

Keinonen, Turkka. (1997). Expected Usability and Product Preference (197-204). In Proceedings of the Conference on Designing Interactive Sys- tems. Amsterdam.

9.

Keinonen, Turkka. (1998). One-Dimensional Usability. http://usuarios.iponet.es/casinada/arteolog/158.htm#ref.

10.

Maynard, Sally. (2001). Children’s Comprehension of Electronic Books: An Empirical Study. The New Review of Children's Literature and Libra- rianship, 7, 29-53.

11.

ISO. (1998). Ergonomic Requirements for Office Work with Visual Display Terminals (VDT)s-Part 11. ISO, 9241(11), -.

12.

Logan, R. J. (1994). Behavioral and Emotional Usability: Thomson Consumer Electronics:New York : AP Professional.

13.

Macleod, Miles. (1994). Usability: Practical Methods for Testing and Improvement (1-12). Proceedings of the Norwegian Computer Society Software ’94 Conference. Sand- vika.

14.

Nielsen, J. Getting Usability Used (3-12). Proceedings of Inter- national Conference on Human- Computer Interaction.

15.

Nielsen, J. (1994). Mea- suring Usability Preference vs. Performance. Communications of the ACM, 37(4), 66-76.

16.

Norman, Donald. (1998). Psychology of Everyday Things:New York : Basic Books.

17.

Trackinsky. (2001). What is Beautiful is Usable. Interacting with Computers, (13), 127-145.

18.

Wilson, Ruth. (2002). The Look and Feel of an E-book: Considerations Interface Design (530-534). Proceed- ings of the 2002 ACM Symposium on Applied computing. Madrid, Spain.

정보관리학회지

논문 투고 OA 정책