바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

  • P-ISSN1013-0799
  • E-ISSN2586-2073

A Study of the Effect on the Level of Knowledge Management for Information Sharing and Knowledge Exchange in Information Center

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, (P)1013-0799; (E)2586-2073
2004, v.21 no.3, pp.31-44
https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2004.21.3.031


  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

Information center represents an important source which seems very well suited for knowledge management investigation. Information center is knowledge intensive and the use of advanced technology may transform the knowledge of business processes for delivering an unique capabilities in an organization. To exam knowledge management, organization culture, importance of knowledge, and support of information technology were identified as potential predictors of knowledge management support in information center. Three hypotheses have been tested with 43 database management specialist surveys. This study presents that the level of information sharing and knowledge exchange is significantly influenced by the extent support of information technology.

Reference

1

김성희. (2004). 성공적인 지식관리를 위한 학술정보센터의 역할에 관한 연구. 한국정보관리학회지, 21(1), 209-232.

2

유사라. (2003). 지식정보자원 관리를 위한 국내 학술연구정보 평가와 활용방안 연구. 정보관리학회지, 20(1), 321-339.

3

장대환. (2004). Knowledge Driver:매일경제신문사.

4

Alavi, M. Knowledge management systems: issues, challenges, benefits. Communications of the ACM, 1(7), 2-41.

5

Blaauw, G. (1999). The control of crucial knowledge:Idea Group Publishing, Hershey.

6

Edwards, D. L. (1997). Toward knowledge management systems in legal domain (158-166). proceeding of group.

7

Carr, Houston H. (1987). Information Centers: The IBM Model vs. Practice. MIS Quarterly, 11(3), 325-338.

8

Caudle, Sharon L. (1991). Key Information Systems Management Issues for the Public Sector. MIS Quarterly, 15(2), 171-188.

9

Chen, C. (1999). Integrating spatial semantic and social structures for knowledge management (1-10). proceedings of 32nd Hawaii international conference on system science. Maui, Hawaii.

10

Computer Science Corporation. (1998). Explicit management of the knowledge asset:Computer Sciences Corporation, London.

11

Davenport, T. (1998). Successful knowledge managemet project. Sloan Management Review, 37(4), 53-56.

12

Davenport , T. (1998). Working knowledge: how organizations manage what they know:Boston, Harvard Business School Press.

13

Delone, W. H. (1992). Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable. Information Systems Research, (3), 60-95.

14

Dennison. (1990). Corporate culture and organizational effectiveness:New York: John Wiley & Sons.

15

Earl, M. J. (1994). Knowledge as strategy: Reflection on skandia international and shorko firms. Strategic Infor- mation Systems; A European Per- spective, , -.

16

Erust and Young Center for Business Knowledge. (1998). Knowledge management in practice. California Management Review, 40(3), 23-28.

17

Fahey, L. (1998). The eleven deadlist sins of knowledge management. California Manage- ment Review, 40(3), 265-276.

18

Garvin, D. A. (1993). Building a learning organization. Harvard Business Review, , 78-91.

19

Ginsburg, M. (1999). Annotate: a web based knowledge management support system for document collection (1-10). proceedings of 32nd Hawaii international conference on system science. Maui, Hawaii.

20

Grover, V. (1993). The inition, adoption, and implementa- tion of telecommunications technologies in U.S. organizations. Journal of Management Information Systems, 10(1), 141-163.

21

Hammond, L. W. (1982). Management Considerations for an Information Center. IBM System Journal, 21(2), 131-161.

22

IBM. (1999). Knowledge challenge:New York.

23

Kettinger, W. J. (1995). Special section: toward a theory of business process change management. Journal of Management Information Systems, 12(1), 9-30.

24

Lamb, R. (1999). Using intranets: preliminary results from a socio-technical field study (1-10). proceedings of 32nd Hawaii international conference on system science. Maui, Hawaii.

25

Leichner, V. (1999). Structuring and systemizing knowledge on the internet-realizing the encyclopedia concept as knowledge medium:Idea Group Publi- shing, Hershy.

26

Mirani, Rajesh. (1994). Impacts of End-User In- formation Center Characteristics on End-User Computing Support. Journal of Management Information Systems, 11(1), 141-166.

27

Newell, S. The intranet as a knowledge management tool?:Idea Group Publishing.

28

Nonaka, I. (1991). The knowledge-creat- ing company:Harvard Business Review, Cambridge.

29

Nonaka, I. (1995). The knowledge creating company:Ox- ford University Press.

30

Piercy, N. (1989). Information control and the power and politices of marketing. Journal of Business Research, (18), 229-243.

31

Ruggles, R. (1998). The state of the notion: knowledge management in practice. California Management Review, 40(3), 80-89.

32

Schein, E. H. (1993). How can organizations learn faster? The Chall- enge of entering the groom. Sloan Management Review, 35(2), 85-92.

33

Tornatzky, L. G. (1982). Innovation characteristics and innovaion adoption-implementation: a meta analysis of findings. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Man- agement, 29(1), 28-45.

34

Ulrich, D. (1996). Intellectual capital = competence X commitment. Solan Management Review, (39), 15-26.

35

Yap, A. Y. (1998). Energing the nexus of corporate knowledge: a potal toward the virtual organization (273-286). proceedings of the international conference on information systems, Helsingki.

36

Zack, M. H. (1999). Developing a knowledge strategy. California Management Review, 40(3), 124-145.

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management