- 권한신청
- P-ISSN1013-0799
- E-ISSN2586-2073
- KCI
문헌정보학 연구논문의 이론체계 현황분석 연구
Analyzing the status of theoretical framework by subfields in library and information science research articles
정동열 (이화여자대학교)
- 다운로드 수
- 조회수
초록
학문의 지식체계를 형성하는데 있어서 하나의 일련과정으로 밀접하게 상호연관된 이론개발 및 이론활용 연구가 뒷받침되어야 한다는 전제 하에, 본 연구는 문헌정보학 연구논문의 이론개발 및 이론활용 사례의 양적/질적 측면을 조사함으로써 문헌정보학의 이론적 기반을 분석하고자 하였다. 특히, 본 연구는 세부주제영역에 따른 이론개발 및 이론활용 연구의 특성에 주목함으로써 문헌정보학의 이론적 기반 형성에 기여한 세부주제영역을 보다 구체적으로 파악하고자 하였다. 이를 위해 1984년부터 2003년에 출판된 1,661편의 연구논문을 대상으로 내용분석을 실시하였다. 분석결과, 22개의 세부주제영역 중에서 정보이용탐색, 정보검색, 도서관경영, 학술커뮤니케이션 영역이 이론개발과 이론활용의 모든 측면에 가장 큰 기여를 한것으로 나타났다. 또한 주제영역별로 생산된 논문 수에 따른 이론적 연구의 비율을 살펴보았을 때, 계량정보학과 전문직 영역에 대한 연구가 매우 이론적인 특성을 보였다. 이 외에 각 세부주제영역별로 사용된 이론을 분석하였을 때, 일부 세부주제영역 간에 유사한 이론적 기반을 공유하고 있는 것으로 나타났다.
- keywords
- Theory building, theory use, theoretical framework of library and information science, theoretical research, 이론개발, 이론활용, 문헌정보학 이론적 기반, 이론적 연구, Theory building, theory use, theoretical framework of library and information science, theoretical research
Abstract
Based upon the assumption that both theory building and theory use are intertwined to construct a cohesive body of knowledge in the filed, this study attempts to identify the state of theoretical framework by examining the number and the quality of theoretical articles by subfield. Theoretical article is characterized as an incident in which in which the author contributes to the development or the use of theory in his/her own paper. Theoretical incidents were identified by a content analysis of 1,661 articles in four LIS journals from 1984 to 2003. The findings suggest that the four subfields, such as information seeking/use, information retrieval, library management, and scholar communication had great contributions to both theory building and theory use. Also, two research areas such as bibliometrics and professionals are very likely to be theoretical. Further, the analysis of the name of theories used by subfields could give an insight into the understanding of how the theoretical frameworks of each subfield are related.
- keywords
- Theory building, theory use, theoretical framework of library and information science, theoretical research, 이론개발, 이론활용, 문헌정보학 이론적 기반, 이론적 연구, Theory building, theory use, theoretical framework of library and information science, theoretical research
참고문헌
(2001). The state of theoretical diversity in information systems.. 6(6), 76-6.
D. H. 1985. Principles and theories in information science. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology. , 153-178.
an analysis of the 1984 journals literature. Library and Information Science Research. , 173-185.
A. L. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago. , -.
(2002). A multidisciplinary framework for theory building. Library Trends. 50, 317-329.
J. 1986. A conceptual framework for theory building in library and information science. Library and Information Science Research. , 227-242.
D. Y. 1993. Theory building in library and information science based on research method analysis. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management Written in Korean. , 23-41.
(2005). Knowledge structure of library and information science in South Korea. Library & Information Science Research. 27(1), 51-72.
(1996). A content analysis of the recent information needs and uses literature. 18, 53-65.
(2000). A longitudinal analysis of the information needs and uses literature. 22, 291-309.
(206). An analysis of the development and use of theory in library and information science research articles. , -.
M. M. 1985. A quantitative analysis of the research articles published in core library journals of 1980. Library and Information Science Research. (ur), 261-273.
B. C. 1980. The methods of library science research some results from a bibliometric survey. Library Research. , 251-268.
(2001). The use of theory in information science research. 52, 62-73.
A. 1991. Quantitative and qualitative assessments of the impact of linguistic theory on information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. , 64-71.
(2000). Recent trends in user studies: action research and qualitative methods. 5(3), -.
(2000). Recent trends in user studies: action research and qualitative methods. 5(3), -.
- 다운로드 수
- 조회수
- 0KCI 피인용수
- 0WOS 피인용수