바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

A Study on Economic Analysis of Culture Program in Public Libraries

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management / Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, (P)1013-0799; (E)2586-2073
2008, v.25 no.3, pp.377-392
https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2008.25.3.377


  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

The need for overall assessment of economic effectiveness of library culture program has been suggested, as its importance continues to grow. Our study proposed a new assessment method by applying DM format and IBM format to contingent valuation method that has been used for analyzing the economic value of culture program. This study also illustrates the process through case analysis so that the public library can apply this model. It is meaningful that the study provides basic framework to evaluate the fair value of the public library by minimizing the bias that the contingent valuation method has.

keywords
공공도서관, 문화프로그램, 독서진흥프로그램, 경제성분석, 가상가치평가법, 바이어스, DM 포맷, IBM 포맷, Public Library, culture program, Activities of Development on Reading, Specialized Program of Library, economic analysis, contingent valuation method(CVM), bias, Dissonance Minimizing(DM) format, Information Bias Minimizing(IBM) format, Public Library, culture program, Activities of Development on Reading, Specialized Program of Library, economic analysis, contingent valuation method(CVM), bias, Dissonance Minimizing(DM) format, Information Bias Minimizing(IBM) format

Reference

1.

정혜경. (2007). 공공도서관의 가치평가를 위한 가상가치평가법 분석. 정보관리학회지, 24(1), 187-208.

2.

Chung, Hye-Kyung. (2008). The Contingent Valuation Method in Public Libraries. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 40(2), 71-80.

3.

한국개발연구원 공공투자관리센터. (2001). 국립디지털도서관 건립사업: 2001년도 예비타당성조사 보고서. 한국개발연구원.

4.

한국개발연구원 공공투자관리센터. (2005). 헌법재판소 도서관 신축사업: 2005년도 타당성재검증 보고서. 한국개발연구원.

5.

AabØ, Svanhild. (2005). Are Public Libraries Worth Their Price?. New Library World, 106(1218), 487-195.

6.

Barron, Daniel D.. The Economic impact of public libraries on South Carolina:Uni- versity of South Carolina.

7.

Champ, P.A.. (1997). Using donation mechanisms to value nonuse benefits from public goods. Journal of Environ- mental Economics and Management, 33(2), 151-162.

8.

Chung, Hye-Kyung. (2007). Measuring the eco- nomic value of special libraries. The Bottom Line: Managing Library Fin- ances, 20(1), 30-44.

9.

Holt, G.E.. (1999). Placing a value on public library services:Public Libraries.

10.

Kanninen, B.. (1995). Bias in discrete response contingent valuation. Journal of Envi- ronmental Economics and Management, 28, 114-125.

11.

Machlup, F.. (1962). The Production and dis- tribution of knowledge in the United States:Princeton Univ. Press.

12.

Krupnick, A.J.. (1992). The Effect of Information on Health Risk Valuations'. Journal of Risk and Un- certainty, 5, 29-48.

13.

Viscusi, W.K.. (1991). Pricing Environmental Health Risks: Survey Assessments of Risk- Risk and Risk-Dollar Trade-Offs for Chronic Bronchitis'. Journal of Environ- mental Economics and Management, 21(1), 32-51.

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management