바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

저작관련 요소분석을 통한 폭소노미 태그의 활용 방안에 관한 연구: LibraryThing을 중심으로

A Study on the Application of LibraryThing Folksonomy Tags through the Analysis of Elements related with Work

정보관리학회지 / Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, (P)1013-0799; (E)2586-2073
2010, v.27 no.1, pp.41-60
https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2010.27.1.041
김동숙 (한양대학교)
정연경 (이화여자대학교)
  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수

초록

본 연구에서는 FRBR의 저작 단위로 태그(tag)가 부여되고 있는 LibraryThing에 나타난 태그를 활용하여, 소설(Fiction) 분야 태그들의 특성, 패턴의 형식적인 측면과 동시에 태그의 내용 분석을 시도하였다. 저작의 서지사항 기술 용어, LCSH 용어와 비교하여 관련 정도를 파악하였고, 이에 포함되지 않는 기타 태그의 출처는 어디인지, 저작의 어떤 측면을 표현하고 있는지, 저작과 연계하여 태그의 용어를 살펴보았다. 특히 소설이란 한 분야로 한정함으로써, 소설만이 가지는 특성인 소설의 3요소(주제, 구성, 문체), 소설 구성의 3요소(인물, 사건, 배경)를 반영한 태그를 파악하여, 향후 소설 정보의 조직 및 검색 요소로서 활용할 수 있는 가능성을 보여주었다. 이를 통해 기존의 색인어를 보완하는 폭소노미 태그의 역할을 규명하고 태깅시스템이 나아갈 새로운 방향을 제시하였다.

keywords
folksonomy, tag, tagger, social classification, social indexing, social tagging, social networking, social cataloging, LibraryThing, LibraryThing for Libraries, LTFL, 폭소노미, 태그, 집단지성, 사회적 분류, 사회적 네트워킹, 소설 검색, 정보 조직, folksonomy, tag, tagger, social classification, social indexing, social tagging, social networking, social cataloging, LibraryThing, LibraryThing for Libraries, LTFL

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the properties of the tags used in the fiction genre, the structural aspect of the patterns and the contents of the tags by utilizing LibraryThing, where the tags are assigned in work units of FRBR. A comparative analysis was conducted in terms of the level of association between the descriptive terms in bibliography and LCSH terms. The study also examined the sources of the tags not included in the bibliographic descriptions or LCSHs, what aspects of work they represented, and the terms used as tags in relation to the work. By restricting the study to a single genre, a number of tags that reflected the characteristics of fiction (three elements of the fiction which are theme, plot, style and three elements of the fiction composition which are character, event, setting) were extracted. This study finds out the role of the tag making up the taxonomy and proposes a new direction for the tagging system by demonstrating the possibility of using tags as facets in information organization and retrieval.

keywords
folksonomy, tag, tagger, social classification, social indexing, social tagging, social networking, social cataloging, LibraryThing, LibraryThing for Libraries, LTFL, 폭소노미, 태그, 집단지성, 사회적 분류, 사회적 네트워킹, 소설 검색, 정보 조직, folksonomy, tag, tagger, social classification, social indexing, social tagging, social networking, social cataloging, LibraryThing, LibraryThing for Libraries, LTFL

참고문헌

1.

김성희. (2009). 디지털화 문화유산 태그의 패턴 및 특성 분석. 한국비블리아학회지, 20(3), 171-185.

2.

박민수. (2003). 현대문학의 이해:느티나무.

3.

박철희. (2009). 문학이론입문:형설.

4.

이강표. (2007). 웹2.0 환경에서의 태깅기술 동향. 정보과학회지, 25(10), 36-42.

5.

이성숙. (2008). 대학도서관 폭소노미 태그의 형태적 특성에 관한 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 42(4), 463-480.

6.

이성숙. (2009). 국내 도서관 폭소노미 태그의 일반적 패턴 연구. 한국비블리아학회지, 20(1), 137-150.

7.

이재윤. (2006). 이용자 생성 메타데이터에 관한 연구. 정보관리연구, 37(3), 1-24.

8.

이정미. (2007). 폭소노미의 개념적 접근과 웹 정보 서비스에의 적용. 한국비블리아학회지, 18(2), 141-159.

9.

조재인. (2008). 학술정보서비스의 폭소노미 분석 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 42(4), 95-112.

11.

Angus, E.. (2008). General patterns of tag usage among university groups in Flickr. Online Information Review, 32(1), 89-101.

12.

Arch, X.. (2007). Creating the academic library folksonomy: Put social tagging to work at your institution. College & Research Libraries News, 68(2), 80-81.

13.

Blachly, A.. (2006). “Tagging meets subject heading” In Thingology Blog. http://www.librarything.com/thingology/2006/05/tagging-meets-subjectheadings.php.

14.

DeZelar-Tiedman, C.. (2008). Doing the Library-ThingTM in an academic library catalog (211-). Proceeding of the International conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications.

15.

Golder, S. A.. (2006). Usage patterns of collaborative tagging systems. Journal of Information Science, 32(2), 198-208.

16.

Hider, P.. (2009). A comparison between the RDA taxonomies and end-user categorizations of content and carrier. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 47(6), 544-560.

17.

Hvass, A.. (2008). Cataloguing with Library-Thing: as easy as 1, 2, 3!. Library Hi Tech News, 25(10), 5-7.

18.

Kipp, M.. (2006). Patterns and inconsistencies in collaborative tagging systems: An examination of tagging practices. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 43(1), 1-18.

19.

LibraryThing. http://www.librarything.com/addbooks/. http://www.librarything.com/addbooks/.

20.

LibraryThing. http://www.librarything.com/groups/combiners. http://www.librarything.com/groups/combiners.

21.

LibraryThing. http://www.librarything.es/concepts#works/thingology. http://www.librarything.es/concepts#works/thingology.

22.

LibraryThing Blog. http://www.librarything.com/blog/2009/01/librarything-and-cigthe-deal.php/. http://www.librarything.com/blog/2009/01/librarything-and-cigthe-deal.php/.

23.

LibraryThing Blog. http://www.librarything.com/blog/2007/07/tagmash.php. http://www.librarything.com/blog/2007/07/tagmash.php.

24.

LibraryThing Thingology Blog. http://www.librarything.com/thingology/2007/07/tagmash-book-tagginggrows-up.php. http://www.librarything.com/thingology/2007/07/tagmash-book-tagginggrows-up.php.

25.

LibraryThing's Wiki. http://www.librarything.com/wiki/index.php/Tagging. http://www.librarything.com/wiki/index.php/Tagging.

26.

Mathes, A.. (2004). “Folksonomies-cooperative classification and communication through shared metadata." in Computer Mediated Communication. http://www.adammathes.com/academic/computer-mediated-communication/folksonomies.html.

27.

Mendes, L. H.. (2009). Subjecting the catalog to tagging. Library Hi Tech, 27(1), 30-41.

28.

Morrison, P. J.. (2007). Why are they tagging, and why do we want them to?. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 34(1), 12-15.

29.

Neal, D.. (2007). Folksonomies and image tagging: Seeing the future?. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 34(1), 7-11.

30.

Noruzi, A.. (2006). Folksonomies:(Un) Controlled Vocabulary? Alireza Noruzi. Knowledge Organization, 33(4), 199-203.

31.

Noruzi, A.. (2007). “Folksonomies: Why do we need controlled vocabulary?" in Webology. http://www.webology.ir/2007/v4n2/editorial12.html.

32.

Pera, Maria S.. (2009). A sophisticated library search strategy using folksonomies and similarity matching. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(7), 1392-1406.

34.

Ritchie, A.. (2009). LibraryThing: An interview with Tim spalding. Crossroads, 15(4), 2-.

35.

Schwartz, C.. (2008). Thesauri and facets and tags, oh my! A look at three decades in subject analysis. Library Trends, 56(4), 830-842.

36.

Smith, G.. (2004). “Folksonomy: Social classification." in Atomiq. http://atomiq.org/archives/2004/08/folksonomy_social_classification.html.

37.

Smith, G.. (2008). Tagging: Powered metadata for the social web:New Riders.

38.

Steele, T.. (2009). The new cooperative cataloging. Library Hi Tech, 27(1), 68-77.

39.

Tennis, J. T.. (2006). Social tagging and the next steps for indexing (-). Proceedings 17th SIG/CR Classification Research Workshop.

40.

Vander Wal, T.. (2005). Folksonomy definition and Wikipedia. http://www.vanderwal.net/random/entrysel.php?blog=1750.

41.

Weber, J.. “Folksonomy and controlled vocabulary in LibraryThing." In Jonathan Weber Bolg. http://jonathanweber.info/samples/2452-Folksonomy.pdf.

42.

Wenzler, J.. (2007). LibraryThing and the library catalog: Adding collective intelligence to the OPAC (-). a workshop on next generation libraries CARL NITIG.

43.

Westcott, J.. (2009). LibraryThing for libraries at Claremont. Library Hi Tech, 27(1), 78-81.

44.

Zollers, A.. (2007). Emerging motivations for tagging: Expression, performance, and activism (-). WWW 2007.

정보관리학회지