바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

논문 상세

이전 다음
논문 투고

Vol.28 No.2
Citation Share

복수 자질에 의한 지적 구조의 계량정보학적 분석연구: 국내 대학도서관 분야 연구논문을 대상으로

An Informetric Analysis on Intellectual Structures with Multiple Features of Academic Library Research Papers

정보관리학회지 / Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, (P)1013-0799; (E)2586-2073
2011, v.28 no.2, pp.65-78
https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2011.28.2.065
최상희 (대구가톨릭대학교)
최상희. (2011). 복수 자질에 의한 지적 구조의 계량정보학적 분석연구: 국내 대학도서관 분야 연구논문을 대상으로. 정보관리학회지, 28(2), 65-78, https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2011.28.2.065
  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수
PDF 다운로드

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to identify topic areas of academic library research using two informetric methods; word clustering and Pathfinder network. For the data analysis, 139 articles published in major library and information science journals from 2005 to 2009 were collected from the Korean Science Citation Index database. The keywords that represent research topics were gathered from two sections: an abstract and titles in references. Results showed that reference titles usefully represent topics in detail, and combining abstracts and reference titles can produce an expanded topic map.

keywords
대학도서관, 계량정보학, 용어클러스터링, 패스파인더네트워크, 주제분석, academic libraries, informetrics, word clustering, Pathfinder network, topic analysis

참고문헌

1.

Ananiadou, Sophia. (2006). Text Mining for Biology and Biomedicine:Artech House Publishers.

2.

Åström, Fredrik. (2004). Changes in the LIS research front: Time-sliced cocitation analyses of LIS journal articles, 1990-2004. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(7), 947-957.

3.

Fattori, M. (2003). Text Mining applied to patent mapping: a practical business cases. World Patent Information, 25(4), 335-342.

4.

Janerving, B. (2001). A comparison of two bibliometric methods for the mapping of the research front. Scientometrics, 65(2), 245-263.

5.

Kessler, M. M. (1963). Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. American Documentation, 14(1), 10-25.

6.

김희정. (2005). 저자 동시인용분석에 의한 국내외 기록관리학 분야의 지적구조 비교에 관한 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 39(3), 207-224.

7.

Kim,Heejung. (2009). Archiving research trends in LIS domain using profiling analysis. SCIENTOMETRICS, 80(1), 75-90.

8.

김판준. (2007). 연구 영역 분석을 위한 디스크립터 프로파일링에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 24(4), 285-303.

9.

Korean Citation Science Index. http://ksci.kisti.re.kr.

10.

Kostoff, Ronald N. (2001). Citation mining: integraing text mining and bibliometrics for research user profiling. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(13), 1148-1156.

11.

Kostoff, Ronald N. (1998). Database tomography for technical intelligence: A roadmap of the nrea-earth space science and technology literature. Information Processing & Management, 34(1), 69-85.

12.

Kostoff, Ronald N. (2005). Factor matrix text filtering and clustering. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56(9), 946-968.

13.

이재윤. (2008). 서지적 저자결합분석 - 연구동향 분석을 위한 새로운 접근. 정보관리학회지, 25(1), 173-190.

14.

Lee, Jae Yun. (2010). Domain analysis with text mining: Analysis of digital library research trends using profiling methods. JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE, 36, 144-161.

15.

MaCain, Katherin W. (1995). R&D themes in information science: A preliminary co-descriptor analysis (275-282). Proceedings of the 5th Biennial Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics. Pine Forest, Il. June 7-10.

16.

McCain, Katherin W. (1991). Mapping economics through the journal literature: An experiment in journal cocitation analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42(4), 290-296.

17.

Miller, T.W. (2004). Data and Text Mining: A Business Applications Approach:Prentice Hall.

18.

Morris, Steven A. (2008). Mapping research specialties, in Annual Review of Information Science and Technology:Information Today.

19.

오세훈. (2005). 우리나라의 정보학 연구 동향에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 22(1), 167-189.

20.

Persson, O. (1990). The intellectual base and research fronts of JASIS 1986-1990. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 45(1), 31-38.

21.

Seglen, P. O. (2000). Scientific productivity and group size: A bibliometric analysis of Norwegian microbiological research. Scientometrics, 49(1), 125-143.

22.

Seo, Eun-Gyung. (1997). An analytical study on research patterns in information science. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 14(1), 269-291.

23.

Small, Henry. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265-269.

24.

Sullivan,D. (2001). Document Warehousing and Text Mining: Techniques for Improving Business Operations, Marketing, and Sales:John Wiley & Sons.

25.

Tseng, Yuen-Hsein. (2007). Text mining techniques for patent analysis. Information Processing & Management, 43(5), 1216-1247.

26.

Todorov, R. (1992). Displaying content of scientific journals: A co-heading analysis. Scientometrics, 23(2), 319-334.

27.

White, Howard D. (1995). Visualizing a discipline: An author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972- 1995. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(4), 327-355.

정보관리학회지

논문 투고 OA 정책