바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.34 No.1
Citation Share

Global Impact of Institutional Repositories in South Korean University

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management / Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, (P)1013-0799; (E)2586-2073
2017, v.34 no.1, pp.197-218
https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2017.34.1.197

(2017). Global Impact of Institutional Repositories in South Korean University. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 34(1), 197-218, https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2017.34.1.197
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

This study attempts to measure visibility and impact of university repositories in South Korea with the help of web-sites, OpenDOAR, ROAR and RWR. Further understanding the self-archiving status of South Korea, the analysis results were compared with the reputation and power of major Asian countries’ university repositories. The results showed that only nine institutional repositories of the universities in South Korea were active. There was only one South Korean university repository in the RWR top 500. All the other repositories ranked in bottom level. However, among Asian countries, Japan and Taiwan have established many institutional repositories. They had 257 and 52 repositories respectively. Fortunately, some leading university repositories in South Korea began activating self-archiving with the help of linking their own research outputs management system. Also, the attempts by other South Korean university repositories expect a substantial quantitative growth in the near future.

keywords
오픈액세스, 오픈액세스 의무화, 대학, 리포지터리, 기관 리포지터리, 웹 활동실적, 가시성, 영향력, 피인용, 세계대학평가, Open Access, OA mandatory, university, repository, institutional repository, webometrics, visibility, impact, citation, world university ranking

Reference

1.

권태훈. (2016). Open Access Road @ POSTECH (1-11). KESLI 전자정보 포럼.

2.

김미향. (2010). 기관 리포지터리의 검색기능 향상을 위한 인명 접근점제어 시스템 구축 연구. 정보관리학회지, 27(3), 125-146.

3.

김미향. (2010). 기관 리포지터리 S-Space 구축과 활성화 전략. 도서관보, 132, 25-44.

4.

김석현. (2012). 이공계 연구중심대학의 진단과 과제. STEPI Insight, 106, 1-33.

5.

김영수. (2015). 지식의 공공성 딜레마.

6.

김희란. (2010). 대학 기관 리포지터리 구축과 운영방안에 관한 연구 (193-202). 한국도서관·정보학회 동계 학술발표회.

7.

박자현. (2012). 도서관경영의 관점에서 본 국내 대학 기관레포지터리 (157-160). 한국정보관리학회 학술대회 논문집.

8.

박희숙. (2016). 기관 리포지터리 및 연구성과관리 현황: KOASAS와 RIMS를 중심으로 (92-109). OAK 컨퍼런스.

9.

서정욱. (2016). 서울대학교의 오픈 액세스 정책 수립에 대한 연구. 서울대학교.

10.

이재민. (2008). 국내 기관 레포지터리 구축 및 활성화 방안 - KAIST의 KOASAS 사례를 중심으로 -. Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice, 39(3), 179-204.

11.

이재원. (2013). 대학의 기관리포지터리(Institutional Repository)가 대학 연구경쟁력 평가에 미치는 영향 분석. 한국문헌정보학회지, 47(3), 49-72. http://dx.doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2013.47.3.049.

12.

이진솔. (2015). 연구중심대학 도서관의 기관 오픈 액세스 리포지터리 구축·운영 사례. 디지틀도서관, 4, 31-38.

13.

임상혁. (2016). 학술 논문의 오픈엑세스를 위한 제언. 한국디지털학술출판연구, 1, 1-10.

14.

장금연. (2013). 학술정보 유통을 위한 기관 레포지터리 운영모형 개발 연구. 정보관리학회지, 30(1), 93-109. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2013.30.1.093.

15.

전승준. (2011). 연구중심대학의 발전 과정과 육성 방향. 과학기술정책, 21(2), 27-41.

16.

정경희. (2010). 공공기금으로 작성된 논문의 오픈액세스 정책에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 27(1), 207-227.

17.

정영미. (2013). 동아시아 지역의 리포지터리 현황과 성장 분석 (75-82). 한국정보관리학회 학술대회 논문집.

18.

정영미. (2014). 일본의 리포지터리 확산과 성장 배경에 관한 연구. 일본근대학연구, (43), 427-448.

19.

조용훈. (2016). 대학 학과기록의 디지털 리포지터리 플랫폼 구축. 한국기록관리학회지, 16(3), 209-233. http://dx.doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2016.16.3.209.

20.

Abrizah, A.. (2010). Global visibility of Asian universities’ Open Access institutional repositories. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 15(3), 53-73.

21.

Isidro F. Aguillo. (2010). Indicators for a webometric ranking of open access repositories. Scientometrics, 82(3), 477-486. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0183-y.

22.

Nader Ale Ebrahim. (2014). Visibility and Citation Impact. International Education Studies, 7(4), 120-125. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ies.v7n4p120.

23.

Bo-Christer Björk. (2013). Open Access—Are the Barriers to Change Receding?. Publications, 1(1), 5-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/publications1010005.

24.

Kiyong Byun. (2013). Quest for building world-class universities in South Korea: outcomes and consequences. Higher Education, 65(5), 645-659. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10734-012-9568-6.

25.

Christian, G. E.. (2008). Issues and challenges to the development of open access institutional repositories in academic and research institutions in Nigeria. International Development Research Centre.

26.

Rowena Cullen. (2010). Institutional repositories: assessing their value to the academic community. Performance Measurement and Metrics, 11(2), 131-147. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14678041011064052.

27.

Rowena Cullen. (2011). Institutional Repositories, Open Access, and Scholarly Communication: A Study of Conflicting Paradigms. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 37(6), 460-470. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2011.07.002.

28.

Ifeanyi J. Ezema. (2011). Building open access institutional repositories for global visibility of Nigerian scholarly publication. Library Review, 60(6), 473-485. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00242531111147198.

29.

Ferreras-Fernández, T.. (2013). Impact of scientific content in open access institutional repositories: A case study of the repository Gredos (357-363). Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Technological Ecosystem for Enhancing Multiculturality.

30.

Yassine Gargouri. (2010). Self-Selected or Mandated, Open Access Increases Citation Impact for Higher Quality Research. PLoS ONE, 5(10), e13636-. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0013636.

31.

Harnad, S.. (2015). Ethics, science, technology, and engineering: An international resource:MacMillan Reference.

32.

Hitchcock, S.. (2013). The effect of Open Access and downloads (‘hits’) on citation impact: A bibliography of studies. https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/354006/1/oacitation-biblio-snapshot0613.html.

33.

Hamid R. Jamali. (2014). How scholars implement trust in their reading, citing and publishing activities: Geographical differences. Library & Information Science Research, 36(3-4), 192-202. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2014.08.002.

34.

Kim, J.. (2006). Motivating and impeding factors affecting faculty contribution to institutional repositories (-). Proceedings of the Joint Conference on Digital Libraries.

35.

Krzak, A.. (2016). Large scale implementation of open access: A case study at the University of Edinburgh’s College of Medicine & Veterinary Medicine. Journal of EAHIL, 12(2), 8-12.

36.

Lange, J.. (2016). Scholarly management publication and Open Access funding mandates: A review of publisher policies. Ticker: The Academic Business Librarianship Review, 1(3), 15-27.

37.

David W. Lewis. (2012). The Inevitability of Open Access. College & Research Libraries, 73(5), 493-506. http://dx.doi.org/10.5860/crl-299.

38.

Helena Markulin. (2014). University of Zagreb Medical School Repository: promoting institutional visibility. Croatian Medical Journal, 55(2), 89-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.3325/cmj.2014.55.89.

39.

Yuri Niyazov. (2016). Open Access Meets Discoverability: Citations to Articles Posted to Academia.edu. PLOS ONE, 11(2), e0148257-. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148257.

40.

(2014). OpenDOAR (The Directory of Open Access Repositories). http://www.opendoar.org/.

41.

Stephen Pinfield. (2014). Open-access repositories worldwide, 2005-2012: Past growth, current characteristics, and future possibilities. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(12), 2404-2421. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.23131.

42.

Quacquarelli Symonds. University rankings: Top universities. https://www.topuniversities.com/university-rankings.

43.

ROAR (The Registry of Open Access Repositories). http://roar.eprints.org/.

44.

RWR (Ranking Web of Repositories). http://repositories.webometrics.info/.

45.

RWU (Ranking Web of Universities). http://www.webometrics.info/en.

46.

Swan, A.. (2010). The Open Access citation advantage: Studies and results to date. http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/268516/2/Citation_advantage_paper.pdf.

47.

Tan Lee-Hwa. (2013). Availability and visibility of open access digital repositories in ASEAN countries. Information Development, 29(3), 274-285. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0266666912466754.

48.

Times Higher Education. World university rankings. https://www.timeshighereducation.com/.

49.

Wagner, A.. (2010). Open access citation advantage: an annotated bibliography. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, 60, -.

50.

Jingfeng Xia. (2012). Self‐selection and the citation advantage of open access articles. Online Information Review, 36(1), 40-51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14684521211206953.

51.

Zainab, A. N.. (2008). Visibility and Malaysian scholarly journals (-). Paper presented at the Workshop on Managing Scholarly Journals.

52.

Peter A. Zuber. (2008). A Study of Institutional Repository Holdings by Academic Discipline. D-Lib Magazine, 14(11/12), -. http://dx.doi.org/10.1045/november2008-zuber.

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management

e-Submission OA Policy