바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

  • P-ISSN1013-0799
  • E-ISSN2586-2073

주요국 저작권법의 도서관 예외 규정 비교 분석

A Comparative Analysis of the Library Exceptions in Copyright Laws in Major Countries

정보관리학회지, (P)1013-0799; (E)2586-2073
2017, v.34 no.1, pp.263-289
https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2017.34.1.263
정경희 (한성대학교)

  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수

초록

본 연구는 저작권법의 도서관 예외규정에 대한 이해를 높이고 국내 규정의 개선방향을 모색하기 위한 것이다. 이를 위하여 한국, 일본, 영국, 호주, 미국의 저작권법에서 도서관 예외규정을 비교분석하였다. 그 결과 이용자를 위한 복제물 제공, 보존을 위한 복제, 상호대차를 위한 복제, 도서관자료의 디지털화를 위한 복제 등이 대표적인 예외규정이었으나 그 세부 조건은 국가마다 상당한 차이가 있었다. 본 연구는 우리나라 저작권법의 도서관 예외규정에서 미공표저작물 및 구하기 힘든 저작물과 정기간행물에 대한 이용자용 복제의 분량 재조정, 제한된 조건하에서 이용자에게 디지털 복제물을 전송, 자체 보존용 복제가 가능한 조건 마련, 상호대차 근거규정 마련, 디지털화 대상범위 제한과 이용범위 확대 등을 제안하였다.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to enhance the understanding of the provisions for library exceptions in copyright laws and to suggest the direction for the revision of provision in the Copyright Act of Korea. This study compares and analyzes the provisions for library exceptions in several countries’ copyright law including Korea, Japan, UK, Australia and USA. This study found that the most common issues in library exception provisions are providing reproduction for users, reproduction for preservation, reproduction for interlibrary loan and digitization of library collections but the conditions for each issue are quite different. The suggestions for the revision of the library exceptions in the Copyright Act of Korea are as follows: changing the amount of reproduction of unpublished works, of works which cannot be obtained at a fair price and of periodicals for users, the transmitting digital reproduction to the user under limited conditions, preparing conditions for reproduction for preservation in libraries, preparing the applicable provisions for reproductions for interlibrary loans and for the limitation of works to be digitized and extending their use at the same time.

참고문헌

1

김종철. (2012). 도서관 서비스에 영향을 미치는 저작권 제한 규정 개선에 관한 연구 : 저작권법 제31조를 중심으로.

2

윤희윤. (2010). 주요 국가의 저작권법상 도서관관련 권리제한 비교분석. 한국문헌정보학회지, 44(4), 277-301.

3

정경희. (2015). 도서관보상금제도의 운영성과에 대한 분석. 한국문헌정보학회지, 49(4), 265-288. http://dx.doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2015.49.4.265.

4

정경희. (2015). 국내 정보서비스 협력체를 통한 원문복사서비스 현황과 개선 방안 연구: 저작권 문제를 중심으로. 정보관리학회지, 32(3), 413-432. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2015.32.3.413.

5

Australian Law Reform Commission. (2013). Copyright and the digital economy: Summary report. https://www.alrc.gov.au/sites/default/files/pdfs/publications/summary_report_alrc_122.pdf.

6

Brown, A. M.. (2013). Copyright exceptions for libraries in the digital age: U.S. Copyright Office considers reform of section 108, highlights of the symposium. College & Research Libraries News, 74(4), 199-214.

8

Graham Peter Cornish. (2015). Reform of UK copyright law and its benefits for libraries. Interlending & Document Supply, 43(1), 14-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/ilds-11-2014-0054.

9

Crews, K. D.. (2008). Study on copyright limitations and exceptions for libraries and archives (-). Paper presented at the meeting of the 7th World Intellectual Property Organization.

10

Crews, K. D.. (2012). Copyright law for librarians and educators: Creative strategies & practical solutions:ALA.

11

Crews, K. D.. (2015). Study on copyright limitations and exceptions for libraries and archives: Updated and revised (-). Paper presented at the meeting of the 30th World Intellectual Property Organization.

12

Gasaway, L. N.. (2013). Copyright questions and answers for information professionals: From the columns of against the grain:Purdue University Press.

13

Hirtle, P. B.. (2009). Copyright & cultural institutions: Guidelines for digitization for U.S. libraries, archives & museum:Cornell University Library.

14

Intellectual Property Office. (2014). Exceptions to copyright: Libraries, archives and museums. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/375956/Libraries_Archives_and_Museums.pdf.

15

International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions. (2013). Treaty proposal on limitations and exceptions for libraries and archives. http://www.eifl.net/system/files/resources/201408/tlib_v4_4_december_2013.pdf.

16

Pedley, P.. (2015). Practical copyright for library and information professionals:Facet Publishing.

17

Sato, Y.. (2015). Digitized contents transmission service for libraries on Japan (-). Paper presented at IFLA WLIC 2015.

18

Simes, L.. (2008). A user’s guide to the flexible dealing provision for libraries, educational institutions and cultural institutions. http://digital.org.au/sites/digital.org.au/files/documents/Flexible%20Dealing%20Handbook%20final.pdf.

19

The Section 108 Study Group. (2008). The Section 108 Study Group report. http://www.section108.gov/docs/Sec108StudyGroupReport.pdf.

20

저작권법 [시행 2016.12.20.] [법률 제14432호, 2016.12.20. 일부개정].

21

著作権法 [2016.11 更新] 2015.6.24. 법률 제46호.

22

Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 c.48.

23

The Copyright and Rights in Performances (Research, Education, Libraries and Archives) Regulations 2014 No.1372.

24

The Copyright and Rights in Performances (Certain Permitted Uses of Orphan Works) Regulations 2014 No. 2861.

25

Copyright Law of the United States and Related Laws Contained in Title 17 of the United States Code 2011.

26

Copyright Act 1968 No. 63(Compilation No. 51, Compilation date: 1 July 2016).

정보관리학회지